Pirates ahoy!

2 bizarre comments about ‘piracy’ – also known as sharing – I read today:

1: Googlephone launch, as reported by the Grauniad.

7.02pm: Why only 512MB for app storage?
Andy Rubin: It helps protect applications against piracy. In the future we’ll increase the storage space.

Eh? How? And if it does protect against ‘piracy’, won’t that be diminished by the planned increase in space?

2: The Grauniad (again) reports on the film Avatar:

For Hollywood studios, a key advantage of 3D is that bootleggers cannot make copies using the simple method of sitting in a cinema with a furtive video camera. If they do, the image they get will be, at best, very blurred, with handheld technology befuddled by digital depth. “Ninety percent of piracy is done by people in the theatre. A crook sits in the theatre with a camcorder,” Jeffrey Katzenberg, chief executive of DreamWorks Animation, told an industry audience last year. “Good luck camcording that.”

Because ripping a DVD is just so difficult, and the result so poor! But sarcasm aside, that figure is an invention and refuted. And shame on the Grauniad for repeating this nonsense.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Enclosure of the Historical Commons, part 1

Today, the Commons has become – one could say, returned as – a key political desire. From peasants to hackers, squatters to scientists,  shared resources for all to contribute to and benefit from are invented, built, defended, with varying degrees of success.

Alongside this, its nemesis Enclosure has become a key tool for understanding what we’re up against.

By the term ‘historical commons’, I mean all that has fallen into the public domain by virtue of the expiry of the term of copyright, that is, all that is unowned. It should be expanded to include physical items – just who owns the Roman ruins, medieval remains, or the works like paintings that are both physical and intellectual? – but for the moment, I will restrict myself to this.

Glyn Moody, author of the excellent Rebel Code, notes that the British Library has just digitized its 500,000th item, a copy of The Birmingham Daily Post from 1864, as part of the British Newspapers 1800-1900 project. Historical resources being made available to all? No:

To access the subscription-based articles in this database, you will need to first register as a user and then purchase either

* A 24-hour pass that provides you access to 100 articles over that period.
* A 7-day pass that provides you access to 200 articles over that period.

The first costs £6.99, the second £9.99.

Not only is this ludicrously expensive, it is hampered by the copyright restrictions:

You may not copy, display, distribute, modify, publish, reproduce, store, transmit, create derivative works from, or sell or license all or any part of the Content, products or services obtained from this Site in any medium to anyone, except as otherwise expressly permitted under applicable law or as described in these Terms and Conditions. You further agree that at no time you will cause or enable any person to access, view, receive or otherwise use any portion of the Content, directly or indirectly, without first paying a fee for such access and viewing, except as provided for herein.

And we can use it to write history how? We cannot afford it, we cannot use it, yet this is all public domain material and our common heritage!

Truly, capital, like nature, abhors a vacuum.

Posted in commons | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The word ‘Anterotesis’

…. may not be ancient Greek, but of much more recent coinage.

It (apparently) means the practice of giving an answer in the form of a question, or more colloquially:

Q: Why is it that Jews always answer one question with another?

A: And what’s wrong with answering one question with another?

It’s a talmudic thing.

Posted in meta | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reboot

The internet is flux not permanence, although the wayback machine tries its best.

So I’m rebooting anterotesis.com, and putting technolalia.org out to pasture for the time being.

The main reason is simplicity, although not being a prolific blogger plays its part.

Also, having started an MA in Digital Humanities at Kings College London, the envisaged separation between the technical and speculative, the geekery and the nebbishism, has broken down. It was useless to try and divide them in the first place, as there is politics in the free software, and techne in the history.

Hence, one blog, rebooted. Useful posts from technolalia and the previous incarnation of anterotesis will be reposted.

Posted in meta | Tagged , | Leave a comment