{"id":158,"date":"2010-07-10T12:52:52","date_gmt":"2010-07-10T11:52:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/?p=158"},"modified":"2010-07-10T12:52:52","modified_gmt":"2010-07-10T11:52:52","slug":"dh-2010-day-three","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/2010\/07\/dh-2010-day-three\/","title":{"rendered":"DH 2010, day three"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Not such an early start, so I missed Joshua Sternfeld&#8217;s talk on <a title=\"Sternfeld, Thinking Archivally: Search and Metadata as Building Blocks for a New Digital Historiography\" href=\"http:\/\/dh2010.cch.kcl.ac.uk\/academic-programme\/abstracts\/papers\/html\/ab-747.html\" target=\"_blank\">Digital Historiography<\/a>. Annoying, but a sign of a good conference is that there&#8217;s too much of interest rather than too little.<\/p>\n<p>For me, the important presentation in the Teaching\/Managing strand was Nowviskie and Porter&#8217;s &#8220;<em><a title=\"Nowviskie and Porter, The Graceful Degradation Survey\" href=\"http:\/\/dh2010.cch.kcl.ac.uk\/academic-programme\/abstracts\/papers\/html\/ab-722.html\" target=\"_blank\">The Graceful Degradation Survey: Managing Digital Humanities Projects Through Times of Transition and Decline.<\/a>&#8221; <\/em>The afterlife of digital projects &#8211; and websites in general &#8211; is not only very important, but quite neglected, seemingly being done on an ad-hoc, voluntary basis. It was more to do with project management, organization and funding; I had hoped to hear something about technical solutions. It did suggest that there is a move to creating smaller, more preservable packets of information: a granular approach insuring against complete meltdown.<\/p>\n<p>Another suggestion was that Digihum projects are increasingly being operated outside the academy. There&#8217;s a subterranean current here at DH2010 of extra-academic projects, &#8216;fragile vessels&#8217; (as mentioned <a title=\"DH 2010, day two\" href=\"http:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/2010\/07\/dh-2010-day-two\/\" target=\"_self\">yesterday<\/a>), small unfunded projects. One of those &#8211; a graduate project now continuing independently \u00a0 &#8211; is <a title=\"Contextus: Describing Narrative in the Digital World \" href=\"http:\/\/http:\/\/contextus.net\/\" target=\"_blank\">contextus<\/a>, which featured in the <em> <\/em><em><a href=\"http:\/\/dh2010.cch.kcl.ac.uk\/academic-programme\/abstracts\/papers\/html\/ab-878.html\">Scanning Between the Lines: The Search for the Semantic Story<\/a><\/em> panel in the afternoon. Aside from being a very clear and useful introduction to RDFa (foaf etc), and being sprinkled with Doctor Who references, the speakers showed the great potential of the &#8216;semantic web&#8217;, about which I&#8217;d previously been a bit doubtful.<\/p>\n<p>Many of the posters displayed, as on day two, were also for small, semi-independent or semi-official projects, using whatever tools are available free (in the financial sense). Somehow, this aspect of the Digital Humanities isn&#8217;t getting the full recognition it deserves. The lack of money shouldn&#8217;t mean abandoning a good or interesting idea, nor should it be considered a denial of permission to do what we want to do. It&#8217;s an obstacle, yes, but not insurmountable. Ways of operating on a shoestring need to be shared. And there is the advantage that without funds, one isn&#8217;t beholden to funders.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Not such an early start, so I missed Joshua Sternfeld&#8217;s talk on Digital Historiography. Annoying, but a sign of a good conference is that there&#8217;s too much of interest rather than too little. For me, the important presentation in the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/2010\/07\/dh-2010-day-three\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[46],"tags":[47,31],"class_list":["post-158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digital-humanities","tag-dh2010","tag-digital-history"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":177,"href":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158\/revisions\/177"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/anterotesis.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}